A bizarre craze seems to be sweeping New Zealand right now. All things derived from Europe, except our creature comforts, must be set aside, as we are expected to embrace all things Māori. It's racism on a grand scale.

No longer do our television stations refer to New Zealand. In fact, we are lucky if it's Aotearoa-New Zealand. No reference to the fact that, as Michael King has written, Māori didn't have a name for these lands, and only came to accept 'Aotearoa' in relatively recent times.

Several newspapers are falling into line, and are now calling our country Aotearoa, a name unknown to most people beyond our shores. No public debate. We are expected to acquiesce.

The name New Zealand, which dates back to Abel Tasman's visit in 1642, came more into early use, and is the name by which our land has always been recognised abroad. It won't be long before the woke who are driving all this insist on officially changing our country's name. Instead of being proud New Zealanders, we'll be expected to call ourselves Aotearoans. They'll try to avoid a referendum lest it results in rejection, like occurred with changing the flag. Just impose it ! The woke have no respect for democracy.

Government departments and public institutions are being renamed at such a rapid rate that it isn't clear what the names refer to. Waka Kotahi for Transport? Why? Since all forms of transport except the canoe were unknown to Māori, and were imported from overseas, why a Māori name? Where did Waka Kotahi come from? Waka, yes. But Kotahi? It doesn't appear in the revered Bruce Biggs' Māori dictionary. Waka Kotahi wasn't a term used by Māori before settlers arrived in the 1840s and 1850s. And there are other institutions with self-bestowed Māori names that are unrecognisable to ordinary Kiwis.

Radio New Zealand, too, has been working full-time. They are deleting the words both 'radio' and 'New Zealand' from everyday use. Nowadays it's Te Irirangi o Aotearoa, or RNZ. Don't mention dreaded English terms! Some Radio New Zealand reporters fall over themselves trying to conform to a ruling from on high that they should introduce themselves in te reo, despite the fact that the concept of radio came from overseas, and was absolutely unknown to Māori.

We have also been told recently that all streets in New Zealand are to be given a Māori name. Wow. That will be an expensive exercise. Who will dream up the new names? The Māori Language Commission, that seems to be churning out new words at 200km/h?

And since Māori were very thin on the ground in the Auckland area in 1840, and were soon rapidly outnumbered by settlers, it won't be appropriate either. A relevant fact provided to members of the Waitangi Tribunal during a Kaipara case I heard was that, in 1840 there were only 800 Māori living on the million acres of land between the Kaipara and East Tamaki. That fact will be conveniently overlooked. Nothing is sufficiently disrespectful for Pākehā, whose street names quite often have family or historical significance to them.

Similar examples of cultural cringe are showing up with the move to teach New Zealand history in our schools. Scratch the surface and it becomes clear that those driving the idea want to downplay the huge significance of the arrival of European culture in New Zealand. Rather, they intend to replace it with only partially accurate accounts of the difficulties Māori faced when brought into contact with a more developed culture.

Recently, I sought from the Ministry of Education details about who was designing the curriculum. Back came the names of a couple of school teachers and a collection of Māori revolutionaries. There were a couple of academics, both Māori. No serious Pākehā historian in sight. We can say with certainty that a skewed version of New Zealand history will be devised, one that leaves out things like the Musket Wars, where Māori did irreparable harm to their own economy and society. Instead, there will be much concentration on 'evil' colonial land purchasers and settler governments, and excessive Māori land confiscations at the end of the wars of the 1860s.

About the last of these, of course students must be told. The confiscations came on top of the damage that Māori had already done to themselves and helped further depress the Māori economy and damage Māori society. But what is taught to modern students should not exclude everything that reflects badly on Māori themselves.

Moreover, kids need to know that up to 50 per cent of Māori in the country in the 1860s sided with the Crown. And they need to be told why. The term 'Kupapa Māori,' to describe those Māori, is regarded by modern Māori as equivalent to being called an Uncle Tom. But it was respected in earlier times.

And if one needs any more evidence that cultural cringe has reached massive proportions in Auckland, have a look at the programme for the Auckland Arts Festival between March 4-21, 2021. Its Māori name, Te Ahurei Toi o Tamaki, takes precedence on the front cover. Remember that in Auckland Māori are only 11.5 per cent of the total population. Pacific Islanders are 13 per cent of Auckland's population, and Asians constitute more than 25 per cent, according to the latest census. People of European ethnicity make up more than 50 per cent of Auckland's population, but in the eyes of the organisers of the festival they don't count.

The programme includes 'kapa haka, Māori artists, waiata sing-alongs and kōrero (that) will bring the taonga that is te reo front and centre for audiences.' Really? In a city where almost 90 per cent of people are not of Māori ethnicity? Why haven't Auckland City, Creative New Zealand, Foundation North and a collection of worthy sponsors spared a thought for the overwhelming majority of Auckland citizens and ratepayers? Where is the 'equity' in this festival? Answer: too much power has been allowed to slip into the hands of crusaders who for too long seem to have been able to commandeer the resources of others for their own political ends.

When, or will, Aucklanders, and New Zealanders as a whole, stop cringing and wake up to what is being done to their culture, and largely with their money?

By: Dr Michael Bassett

First published: Northland Age, 1 Mar, 2021